Laserfiche WebLink
National State Auditors Association <br /> <br />April 26, 2002 <br /> <br />Mr. Robert R. Peterson <br />State Auditor <br />State Capital Building <br />600 East Boulevard <br />Bismarck, North Dakota 58505 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Peterson: <br /> <br />We have reviewed the system of quality control of the State of North Dakota, Office of the State Auditor, (the <br />office) in effect for the period March 1, 2001, through February 28, 2002. A system of quality control <br />encompasses the office's organizational structure and the policies adopted and procedures established to <br />provide it with reasonable assurance of conforming with governmental auditing standards. The design of the <br />system and compliance with it are the responsibility of the office. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on <br />the design of the system, and the office's compliance with the system based on our review. <br /> <br />We conducted our review in accordance with the policies and procedures for external quality control reviews <br />established by the National State Auditors Association (NSAA). In performing our review, we obtained an <br />understanding of the office's system of quality control for audits conducted in accordance with government <br />auditing standards. In addition, we tested compliance with the office's quality control policies and procedures <br />to the extent we considered appropriate. These tests covered the application of the office's pohcies and <br />procedures on selected engagements. Because our review was based on selective tests, it would not necessarily <br />disclose all weaknesses in the system of quality control or all instances of lack of compliance with it. <br /> <br />Because there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control, departures from the <br />system may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of a system of quality control to <br />furore periods is subject to the risk that the system of quality control may become inadequate because of <br />changes in conditions, or because the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. <br /> <br />In our opinion, the system of quality control of the State of North Dakota, Office of the State Auditor, in effect . <br />for the period March 1,2001, through February 28, 2002, has been suitably designed and was complied with <br />during the period to provide reasonable assurance of conforming with government auditing standards. <br /> <br /> ~ O.~~ <br />Team Leader I V <br />National State Auditors Association <br />External Quality Control Review Team <br /> <br />National State Auditors Association <br />External Quality Control Review Team <br /> <br /> Relmond P. Van Daniker, NASACT Executive Director, rvandaniker~nasact, org <br />2401 Regency Road, Suite 302, Lexington, Kentucky 40503-2914, Telephone (859) 276-1147, Fax (859) 278-0507 <br /> 444 N. Capitol Street, NW, Suite 234, Washington, DC 20001, Telephone (202) 624-5451, Fax (202) 624-5473 <br /> www.nasact.org <br /> <br /> <br />