Laserfiche WebLink
<br />( <br /> <br />Metropolltan Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan <br /> <br />How did the community benefit from the 2000 bike plan?? <br /> <br />JurisdictIon Tot,IShlln CompJetcd(orpartially I, Delcled ". Additional <br />Term Projetts completed) Progres:ll Mtivlty Completed <br />Cass 0 <br />Cla~' " 0 <br />Dilworth 0 <br />Fargo " 12 <br />.\loorhead 10 2 0 0 <br />W~tFargo 0 0 <br />TOlIll 66 36 18 II 13 <br />.PBrc........Q8Achie.&:IW8.C.Ic~18t6dbysublract"lgMI8ted prnjocl'Brojad~if'lQ'BnY8ddibo","1 projaclscOO1pk!lad <br /> <br />PeI"ce:nlage <br />Acbie\'ed* <br /> <br />811.9"10 <br />100.0"1. <br /> <br />1110.0% <br /> <br />85.7% <br />130.0'Y. <br /> <br />140.0% <br /> <br />116.7% <br /> <br />"The MetropolitBn Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan written in 2000 has proven succesdulln both planning bikeway <br />projN:ts and Implementing sfrategles to address the needs of the curren' bikeway s)'stem..." <br /> <br /> <br />~Tts', <br /> <br />'.,.j- <br />Tra~heallhy,......lh~andwise",. <br /> <br />Metropolltan Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan <br /> <br />How did the community benefit from the 2000 bike plan?? <br /> <br />Comparison of 2000 and 2005 Bike network miles (ront.) <br /> <br />J....d~I.,..,. hr.DBib~.y %'>: MOOr';., Blkt".~' , H" <br />r.-,. ,~ 1005 ........ ,~ :U~5, ~.- <br />('1...1 !UU ..~ 51'% 1!.61 !Ul Ill'!> <br />~'Ioo.11 l,~. ,." 00" l"" 1,0' .ll'.. <br />C1...1Il 9.l1 2\" luO 1<-'" .II"'. <br />To,.l "" .D< ,,% 41.'" .Ul Ill'!> <br /> <br /> Comparison of2000 and 2005 Bike network milcs (conM,) <br />J",I.d1c_' W,,"Fo.rIl'lBlk''''1 % lIl1worthBlk.w~ % 'TotoIClI...B1k....Y , <br />,~ """ -. IDC..... .. ,- :lOllS" 1"""_ -. -, IftC...... <br />,~, ., ".<12 ,~ ... ". .., ... '~.11 '13%' <br />0...11 1.13 1.13% ... 'M " " 11.2~ '" <br />G.. III 3_13 3.1~ "' " 1.57 " 34,ro ~.91 - <br />,- ".33 15.11I - " .... '"' lU.13 -" ~ <br />""......:~"lJ"C<)(; <br /> <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />~Tts\ <br /> <br />-,~;- <br />Tl1Iv",h8allhy.willl~hymdW;Sll' <br /> <br />2 <br />