Laserfiche WebLink
Flood Diversion Board of Authority—August 13, 2015 2 <br /> <br />The City of Oxbow’s request to intervene as a party to the lawsuit with the Diversion Authority was <br />granted. The judge issued a clarification on the injunction order which allows property acquisitions and <br />negotiations to resume in Oxbow. <br /> <br />6. TECHNICAL UPDATE <br />Recommended Contract Actions Summary <br />Mr. Spiller discussed two change orders and one new contract as follows: <br /> <br /> Change Order No. 2 with Industrial Contract Services, Inc. for 4th Street pump station project in <br />the amount of $176,462.97; <br /> Change Order No. 3 with Industrial Builders, Inc. for 2nd Street downtown levee project in the <br />amount of $225,056; <br /> Contract award with Industrial Builders, Inc. for 2nd Street North Floodwall South of Pump Station <br />project in the amount of $16,184,905.85; and Change Order No. 1 (at no cost) which will allow for <br />the Mid-America Steel and Case Plaza properties to be removed from the contract if negotiations <br />are not reached. <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mr. Mahoney moved and Mr. Gehrig seconded to approve the appropriation of <br />funds for Change Order No. 2 with Industrial Contract Services, Inc. in the <br />amount of $176,462.97; Change Order No. 3 with Industrial Builders, Inc. in the <br />amount of $225,056; and contract award and Change Order No. 1 with Industrial <br />Builders, Inc. in the amount of $16,184,905.85 and recommend approval of the <br />appropriation of funds by the Dakota Metro Flood Board for the Diversion <br />Authority. On roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Spiller discussed one Authority Work Directive (AWD) with URS and Task Order Amendments <br />with Houston Moore Group LLC (HMG) as follows: <br /> <br /> URS AWD-00051 R0—cultural mitigation for five impacted homes that are part of the Mickelson <br />Levee extension project in the amount of $43,000; <br /> HMG Task Order 2 Amendment 5—close out task order for a deduction of $4,001.30; <br /> HMG Task Order 3 Amendment 5—close out task order for a deduction of $265.10; <br /> HMG Task Order 4 Amendment 5—close out task order for a deduction of $20,209.95; <br /> HMG Task Order 5 Amendment 4—close out task order for a deduction of $59,016.55; <br /> HMG Task Order 7 Amendment 4—extend period of performance to March 31, 2016 at no <br />additional cost; <br /> HMG Task Order 10 Amendment 6—extend period of performance to March 31, 2016, at no <br />additional cost; <br /> HMG Task Order 11 Amendment 3— extend period of performance to March 31, 2016, at no <br />additional cost; <br /> HMG Task Order 14 Amendment 3—extend period of performance to March 31, 2016, at no <br />additional cost; <br /> HMG Task Order 16 Amendment 2—extend period of performance to March 31, 2016, at no <br />additional cost; <br /> HMG Task Order 1 Amendment 6—extend period of performance to March 31, 2016, in the <br />amount of $450,000 for project management; <br /> HMG Task Order 6 Amendment 7—extend period of performance to March 31, 2016, in the <br />amount of $11,000 for land management services; <br /> HMG Task Order 8 Amendment 11—extend period of performance to March 31, 2016 for Work- <br />In-Kind at no additional cost; <br /> HMG Task Order 9 Amendment 14—extend period of performance to March 31, 2016 in the <br />amount of $330,000 for hydrology and hydraulic modeling; <br />