02-13-2014
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
Flood Diversion Board of Authority
>
Agenda
>
2014
>
02-13-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2014 11:18:59 AM
Creation date
11/28/2018 2:35:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />added and/or subtracted from the costs and benefits output from the Hazus <br />model. <br />3. Cost information for analysis: <br />a. Construction costs (quantitative) <br />b. Mitigation costs (quantitative) <br />c. Operation and maintenance costs (quantitative) <br />d. Social costs (qualitative) <br />4. Benefit information needed for analysis: <br />a. Flood damages/fighting (quantitative) <br />b. Development (quantitative) <br />c. Induced economic growth (quantitative) <br />d. Social (qualitative) <br />5. Analyze the following MN EIS alternatives (as described in the FSDD): <br />a. Proposed Project <br />b. Base No Action Alternative (no emergency measures) <br />c. C2 (move the Southern Alignment north 1.5 miles) <br />3. Other Studies and Support: <br />a. Compilation of completed and currently funded flood risk reduction projects <br />since FFREIS – Develop list of project descriptions and available information. <br />b. County and city land use plans (relevant portions) – Develop summary <br />information. <br />c. Analysis of hydrologic rating curve – Develop with updated H&H models that <br />incorporate the most recent project modifications and mitigation measures <br />(H&H 7.1 model update). <br />4. Deliverables <br />a. Model outputs for different flood frequencies for alternatives listed in VI.2.5. <br />b. For alternatives modeled, maps of the flood damages/fighting, development <br />and qualitative social outputs displayed geographically indicating North Dakota <br />versus Minnesota and metropolitan versus rural <br />c. Project descriptions and available information of completed and currently <br />funded flood risk reduction projects since FFREIS <br />d. Wetland impacts summary memo due to project changes <br />e. Summary of County and city land use plans <br />f. Updated H&H model <br /> <br />HMG_TO8-A6_Long.docx 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.