2. Abatements/Wal-Mart, Sam's
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2002
>
10-07-2002
>
Regular agenda
>
2. Abatements/Wal-Mart, Sam's
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2004 2:13:57 PM
Creation date
10/1/2002 6:27:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INVESTIGATION OF ABATEMENT AI'PLICATION <br /> <br />ABATEMENT NO. 4224 <br /> <br />Following is a report on the investigation of the abatement application of: Wal-Mart <br /> <br />Cass County Board of Commissioners and State Tax Commissioner: <br /> <br />The applicant is asking that the valuation be reduced from $5,940,000 to $5,121,000 for the year <br />2002 on their property located at 4731 13m Av South, Fargo. The requested reduction is about <br />14%. Wal-Mart has submitted anincome summary report to support their claim. <br /> <br />The City of Fargo recommended denial of the abatement application. <br /> <br />I inspected the property and reviewed the information that was supplied by the applicant and the <br />City of Fargo Assessment Office. <br /> <br />I reviewed the applicant's income valuation summary. They estimated the economic rent at <br />$5.25 per square foot based upon a total square footage of 114,085 square feet. Thc taxpayer <br />used a 5% vacancy factor, along with a 10% operating expense ]Pastor. Further, they used a 10% <br />capitalization rate to arrive at the valuation of thc property. Wal-Mart did not submit any <br />information on how these numbers were arrived at. These numbers are quite subjective without <br />documentation. Small errors in the estiraated rent, vacancy factor, operating expense factor and <br />capitalization rate can drastically change the valuation conclusion. It also appears that the square <br />footage of the building is understated. A 4,556 sq. f~. addition that was built in 1998 may not <br />have been included in the total area. Also, there is no mention of the enclosed and open garden <br /> <br />The City of Fargo has supplied a report that includes information in regards to leases, costs and <br />sales of properties. The City of Fargo has also submitted information indicating that the property <br />is fairly assessed with other large retail stores. <br /> <br />I've also enclosed a list of assessments of the Wal-Mart stores in Bismarck, Minot and Grand <br />Forks. The assessments are very similar to each other. It is my rcconunendation to deny the <br />abatement. The taxpayer has not provided infommtion showing that the assessment is invalid, <br />inequitable, or unjust. <br /> <br />SUGGESTED MOTION: "I move that Abatement ~b1224 be denied, as recommended by <br />the City of Fargo and the Director of Equalization." <br /> <br />Dated this 27~h day of September, 2002. <br /> <br />Frank Klein <br />Cass County Director of Tax Equalization <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.