Laserfiche WebLink
Providing Services to Limited English Proficiency(LEP)Individuals <br /> In accordance with DOJ guidance pertaining to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,42 U.S.C.§2000d,recipients of federal financial <br /> assistance must take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to their programs and activities for persons with limited English <br /> proficiency(LEP). See U.S.Department of Justice,Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI Prohibition <br /> Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons,67 Fed.Reg.41,455(2002). For more information <br /> on the civil rights responsibilities that recipients have in providing language services to LEP individuals,please see the website <br /> http://www.lep.gov. <br /> Ensuring Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations <br /> The DOJ regulation,Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations,28 C.F.R.pt.38,requires State Administering Agencies(SAAs)to <br /> treat faith-based organizations the same as any other applicant or recipient. The regulation prohibits SAAs from making awards or grant <br /> administration decisions on the basis of an organization's religious character or affiliation,religious name,or the religious composition of its <br /> board of directors. <br /> The regulation also prohibits faith-based organizations from using financial assistance from the DOJ to fund inherently(or explicitly) <br /> religious activities. While faith-based organizations can engage in non-funded inherently religious activities,they must hold them <br /> separately from the program funded by the DOJ,and recipients cannot compel beneficiaries to participate in them. The Equal Treatment <br /> Regulation also makes clear that organizations participating in programs funded by the DOJ are not permitted to discriminate in the <br /> provision of services on the basis of a beneficiary's religion. For more information on the regulation,please see the OCR's website at <br /> http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/about/ocr/equal_fbo.htm. <br /> SAAs and faith-based organizations should also note that the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act(Safe Streets Act)of 1968,as <br /> amended,42 U.S.C.§3789d(c);the Victims of Crime Act of 1984,as amended,42 U.S.C.§ 10604(e);the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency <br /> Prevention Act of 1974,as amended,42 U.S.C.§5672(b);and VAWA,Pub.L.No.113-4,sec.3(b)(4), 127 Stat.54,61-62(to be codified <br /> at 42 U.S.C.§ 13925(6)(13))contain prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of religion in employment. Despite these <br /> nondiscrimination provisions,the DOJ has concluded that it may construe the Religious Freedom Restoration Act(RFRA)on a case-by- <br /> case basis to permit some faith-based organizations to receive DOJ funds while taking into account religion when hiring staff,even if the <br /> statute that authorizes the funding program generally forbids recipients from considering religion in employment decisions. <br /> Please consult with the OCR if you have any questions about the regulation or the application of RFRA to the statutes that prohibit <br /> discrimination in employment. <br /> Using Arrest and Conviction Records in Making Employment Decisions <br /> The OCR issued an advisory document for recipients on the proper use of arrest and conviction records in making hiring decisions. See <br /> Advisory for Recipients of Financial Assistance from the U.S.Department of Justice on the U.S.Equal Employment Opportunity <br /> Commission's Enforcement Guidance:Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the <br /> Civil Rights Act of 1964(June 2013),available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov//about/ocr/pdfs/UseofConviction Advisory.pdf. Recipients <br /> should be mindful that the misuse of arrest or conviction records to screen either applicants for employment or employees for retention or <br /> promotion may have a disparate impact based on race or national origin,resulting in unlawful employment discrimination. In light of the <br /> Advisory,recipients should consult local counsel in reviewing their employment practices. If warranted,recipients should also incorporate <br /> an analysis of the use of arrest and conviction records in their Equal Employment Opportunity Plans(EEOPs)(see below). <br /> Complying with the Safe Streets Act <br /> An organization that is a recipient of financial assistance subject to the nondiscrimination provisions of the Safe Streets Act,must meet two <br /> obligations:(1)complying with the federal regulation pertaining to the development of an EEOP(see 28 C.F.R.pt.42,subpt.E)and(2) <br /> submitting to the OCR findings of discrimination(see 28 C.F.R.§§42.204(c),.205(c)(5)). <br />