Laserfiche WebLink
<br />these safety concerns, Projects in the long-range element address all remaining safety issues <br />along these corridors, <br /> <br />CONGESTION MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />Future congestion on the metropolitan road network was assessed in Chapter 4 of the Plan. By <br />the year 2030, approximately 67 segments of roadway were identified as LOS E or F. At LOS E <br />(V/C of 0.85 to 1.0), traffic flow becomes unstable with periodic system breakdowns, and at <br />LOS F (V IC of 1,0 or greater) there is usually frequent and sustained system breakdown. Of <br />these approximately 45 segments or nearly 70 percent will be addressed by short or long-range <br />projects (see Figure 9). This represents a substantial reduction in congestion for the metropolitan <br />areas, As can be seen on the graphic, many of the remaining unserved segments are minor short <br />links, intersections or rampslfrontage roads; and virtually all of these are in the LOS E and not <br />LOS F category. Fiscal constraint requirements dictated that not all congestion locations could <br />be programmed with major capacity improvements. However, it appears by the map that the <br />worse situations will be remedied by 2030. Additionally, remaining potential congestion site <br />issues may be resolved by various TSM improvements such as left or right turn lanes at <br />intersections, no right turn on red lights or only three-way access management techniques. <br />Further, it is possible over the next 25 years that as some capacity improvements are constructed, <br />travel behaviors could change, which may eliminate some of the unserved locations. Future <br />transportation plans and traffic forecast models should monitor these developments, as well as <br />projected growth to identify remaining or emerging congestion needs. Also, those routes <br />identified as LOS 0 by 2030 (V/C of 0.7 to 0.85; generally stable flow but noticeable <br />congestion, moderate delay and limited maneuverability) should also be monitored to gauge if <br />they appear to be losing mobility at a rate faster than predicted by the model. <br /> <br />FUTURE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM <br /> <br />The proposed future roadway functional classification is shown in Figure 10. With <br />continued growth, it is expected that the functional classification system will change over the <br />next 25 years. The next formal update of the functional classification system is scheduled to <br />occur in 2004. It is anticipated that as part of this update, some of the roadways currently <br />identified on the future functional classification map may be advanced into the existing system, <br />In addition, some routes' classification may be upgraded (example, 42nd Street in Fargo from a <br />collector to a minor arterial or Clay County Road II from a collector to a minor arterial south of <br />1-94). In some cases, a jurisdiction's existing functionally classed roadway may need to be <br />removed from the system to reflect change of use over time, or to balance mileage within the <br />system in accordance with state and federal guidelines, The prospect for mileage deletion <br />pertains mainly to Fargo, which is heavy with collector routes. It is anticipated that the City will <br />remove some of its more "local" collector routes from the system to comply with mileage <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Executive Summary - Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan Update <br />Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments <br /> <br />June 2004 <br />Page 21 <br />